Managing against autumn olive

By Bill Kleiman

To get control of a dense invasive olive on 28-acres we brush mowed, seeded heavily, started a frequent fire program, and continue to make visits to apply basal bark herbicide to individual shrubs. We have been mostly successful.

Invasive autumn olive is easy to spot from the stems which appear to be covered with rust or cinnamon powder. The stems also have false thorns which you will feel if you take your gloves off. The leaves are wavy with a silvery bottom.

I could tell various stories from these three aerial views but today I will stick to autumn olive.

If you look on the left side of the unit where in 1939 there is open prairie and a dry gulch running east to west.

The invasive shrub Autumn olive, Elaeagnus umbellata, was likely planted in the 1980s. It was a thing back then to plant olive to make “great habitat”. Some places may still be selling this invasive. Please don’t.

In the 2010 aerial, olive is very abundant, which is the year TNC purchased this tract at Nachusa Grasslands.

The third aerial shows shrub cover much reduced from brush mowing, herbicide, and frequent fire. Most of the woodies you would see today there are black oak, wafer ash, and some olive we are still chasing.

There were about 28-acres of very thick autumn olive. Above is an image from that tract showing where a brush mulcher had just passed through. The ground layer was so shaded that exposed soil would dominate a monitoring quadrat. But there were also still open patches of prairie here and there, so foliar spaying the olive was not chosen.

We hired this contractor to mulch the 28-acres in about a week. Back in 2010 it might have cost $15,000.

We used a skid loader with mulcher to also clear areas.

We assumed most of the mowed olive was going to re-sprout. That is what shrubs do. And we would need to use frequent fire, which would require a prairie to burn. So we planted a heavy amount of prairie seed harvested with an old combine from prairie plantings at Nachusa. This is a view into the combine hopper.

We planted about two full grain wagons of combine mix.

We used this little tractor with a pendulum seed broadcaster on the back. I think that is Mark Kruis on the tractor.

Mike Carr was a neighbor to the tract back then and as I went door to door to introduce myself to the neighbors I met Mike. He was so happy we had purchased the tract, stating he wanted to get involved. Boy did he. Mike became a major presence on this unit, working with other volunteers and seasonal crews. 15 years and counting. They wore backpacks and applied the basal bark herbicide (mineral oil with a broadleaf herbicide) to the bottom bark of each and every olive they could find. Basal bark herbicide is very effective on olive. You should get complete control of every plant treated. But how to find the time to get to each one? They repeated this work over 15 years with a pleasant can-do attitude.

Currently, there is still a bit of olive out there and we will keep going after it.

An olive shrub basal bark treated mid-July and crispy four weeks later. The blue paint is how I mark a hand full of plants so I can know an individual was treated.

We use frequent fire at this unit to keep the shrubs in check. This image is from there.

August 22, 2012: Just two years after we started our work in this olive patch.

To find other posts about invasive shrubs on this blogsite just use the search bar on the site. And follow our blog by putting in an email address there.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

Wicking cattails

Reported by Bill Kleiman

Agnes Wojnarski using a herbicide wicking wand on cattails. She used Aquaneat (glyphosate) with surfactant and blue dye. Label states up to 33% glyphosate for wick/wiper applications. A coverage of about half the plant gives good control. She used that backpack with only 2 gallons of solution for weeks.

Agnes says “the hardest part is to not get any herbicide on yourself. I use breeder gloves and extra thick gloves and take a break every 45 minutes to check my body. So far so good!  As long as you avoid wind and swaying cattails trying to touch your face.” 

Dana Sievertson says this wand design is by Stantec, a contractor in our region. It has a microfiber towel as the wicking pad. They store it in an empty bucket.

After treatment photos showing browned cattails:

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 8 Comments

Shaw Nature Reserve – 2026 GRN Workshop – Job Opening

Mike Saxton – Shaw Nature Reserve – Gray Summit, MO – Divison of the Missouri Botanical Garden

As we come off a successful and engaging 2025 Workshop with the Kansas Biological Survey, KU Field Station, Johnson County Park and Recreation District and Baker University, planning has begun for the 2026 Workshop.

Shaw Nature Reserve, a 2,400 acre site located 35-miles outside St. Louis, MO, will host in 2026. Natural communities at SNR include woodlands, prairies, dolomite glades, floodplain forests, and wetlands that are actively managed to promote native biodiversity. The three core mission areas of SNR include native plant horticulture, environmental education, and ecological restoration.

Above: remnant glades at with missouri evening primrose (Oenothera macrocarpa) and glade coneflower (Echinacea simulata)

Restoration efforts began at Shaw Nature Reserve in 1980 with the first prairie plantings and Rx fire. Controlled burns started in woodland communities in 1992. The program has grown over the last decade and the scope of stewardship has increased dramatically.

Dates and specific agenda are TBD but anticipated elements include glade management, prairie planting, logging/land clearing, volunteer stewardship, equipment/shop tours, and our core stewardship activities of fire, weeds and seeds. Research projects including work on grass specific herbicide use in grass-dominated prairies, prairie planting establishment mowing practices and use of mycorrhizal inoculant will be discussed.

Above 2nd year prairie planting establishing well after cedar logging.

Once the exact dates are set, we will send out a Save the Date – GRN 2026!

Shaw Nature Reserve is actively recruiting for the position of Manager, Restoration and Land Stewardship.  The full position description and application can be found here on the Missouri Botanical Garden career opportunities page.

The Nature Reserve has a thriving ecological restoration program with highly skilled staff, a dedicated community of volunteers, and professional equipment and facilities to support ambitious restoration projects and long-term stewardship of regional biodiversity.

Applications will be reviewed on a rolling basis. Applicants are encouraged to apply promptly and should submit their applications no later than the end of September

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

2025 GRN workshop success in Lawrence Kansas

by Bill Kleiman

About 75 attended our 20th GRN workshop from a diversity of groups and geographies.

Sara Baer had opening remarks where she thanked us practitioners for doing and sharing lessons learned. Then Helen Alexander gave a talk on the northeast region of Kansas. Liz Koziol presented on soil inoculants in restorations. Then we went for a tour of the Baker University Wetlands.

Touring Baker University Wetlands

Common topics of discussion include invasive plants such as the King Ranch Bluestem which was being spot sprayed with glyphosate.

Invasive King Ranch Bluestem. A wispy delicate Andropogon.

King Ranch Bluestem has these hairs at the leaf nodes.

On day two we were with Johnson County Parks and Recreation District. We broke into three groups and travelled by van and toured several restorations and two remnants.

And we enjoyed native plants and pondered how to help them prosper.

Eryngium leavenworthii, the same genus as rattlesnake master but very short and purple.
We think this is Agalinus aspera. When we are at the back of the tour line we decide for ourselves what we are seeing.
Agalinus auriculata

Invasive Lespedeza, L cuneata, was there to darken our doorway. We saw singles, small thickets and fields of Sericea, but we also saw examples of high diversity prairie plantings in which Sericea was being excluded with some careful foot and UTV patrols.

Below is Korean Lespedeza.

Invasive Korean Lespedeza, Kummerowia stipulacea. This short sprawling weed had formed a thicket.

My crumpled agenda has the presenters and agencies to thank. Sara Baer offered to host this GRN and she, above all, made this happen.

Elizabeth Bach, Sara Baer and Mike Saxton

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

How much abundance of seed should we plant to establish a good prairie in a corn field?

By Bill Kleiman

A basic question in prairie plantings is what is the weight of seed to plant per acre?  You would think that the community of prairie restoration ecologists would have answered this question in a controlled study a few times.  But back in 2006 I did not know of any published studies, so I started a study and then partnered with ecologist, David Goldblum, to gather the data and publish a nice summary.

The punch line is you should plant a lot of seed, but there is a point of diminishing returns. For us 50 pounds per acre of uncleaned seed (with plenty of chaff) produced as good a result as did 70 pounds.

50 pounds per acre of uncleaned seed is a lot! When I first started planting prairies at Nachusa we were at perhaps 12 to 15 pounds per acre. We got mixed results, with some areas not establishing well and exotic plants occupying a lot of space. Then we noticed that volunteer Jay Stacy got a fantastic establishment of prairie by dumping on an immense amount of seed, which he was not weighing. Jay eventually produced a series of home run prairies and mentored many others here. So we increased our seeding weights, eventually hitting in the 40 to 50 pounds per acre of uncleaned seed. Our mixes were very high in species too, with 50 to 150 species. We have planting reports for many of these on the Friends of Nachusa Grasslands website.

So the data supported our theory that we need a lot of seed. Do not expect the natives to be able to keep out the exotics unless you seed a lot. And of course you will have exotics anyway as lawn grasses seem to be everywhere.

Here is a short summary of the study design:

In the fall of 2006 we set up a “random block design” to test four seed weights per acre for planting prairie seed in a field that was had been in a decades long corn/soy rotation.  This random block was a row of five cells, and there were three rows. This means there were three replicates. Each row is randomized. Hence the random block.

Here are the four treatments:

  1. 10 pounds bulk weight seed per acre.
  2. 30 pounds bulk weight seed per acre.
  3. 50 pounds bulk weight seed per acre.
  4. 70 pounds bulk weight seed per acre.
  5. Control: No seed will be added.

By bulk weight I mean the seed mix was not cleaned and contained chaff and stems. From previous comparisons to cleaned seed the bulk mix is about 40% seed by weight.

On the second growing season of the planting Northern Illinois University grad student Brian Glaves and his professor David Goldblum used quadrat to gather the data. The study was evaluated using Floristic Quality Indices recording all species and their cover

This is the random block prepped and seeded.
The seed was carefully planted by hand. The seed is hard to notice, and yet it is enough to establish a thick prairie. Seeds are little packets of hope.
Bernie and Bill. Bernie helped me plant the seed. 19 years ago Bernie!.
Paper bag B4 would contain the carefully weighed seed for that cell. Each bag had the same seed mix, but there were different weights of the mix in each bag.

David Goldblum wrote the paper we published in 2013. Here he is in 2017 setting up a different experiment at Nachusa Grasslands

Here is the link to the paper in Ecological Restoration:

The Impact of Seed Mix Weight on Diversity and Species Composition in a Tallgrass Prairie Restoration Planting, Nachusa Grasslands, Illinois, USA

David Goldblum, Brian P. Glaves, Lesley S. Rigg and Bill Kleiman

Ecological Restoration, June 2013, 31 (2) 154-167; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.31.2.154

https://er.uwpress.org/content/31/2/154

From the paper: “Low seed density plots had low species evenness, while densities of 56.0 and 78.5 kg/ha [these were the high seed rates 50 pounds and 70 pounds] showed significantly greater evenness. Based on germination and growth, the floristic quality index (FQI) was significantly lower in the control and lighter seed weight treatments. …Considering all ecological metrics analyzed, there were few differences between the 56.0 and 78.5 kg/ha treatments.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Collecting 1.4 tons of seed

by Leah Kleiman, Land Restoration Specialist, Dane County Parks, Wisconsin

Dane County Parks Natural Areas Team – Dane County Parks is responsible for managing 15,000 acres of land. The role of the Natural Areas team is to restore most of these acres to oak-hickory woodland, oak savanna, and prairie. We are currently able to actively manage 5,000 of these acres. Every year we convert several hundred acres from agricultural fields to native habitat, usually prairie, which requires a lot of seed. The slower process of restoring degraded woodland also requires the addition of seed, and we often add to previous plantings when we can. This means we require several thousand pounds of seed per year. 

One of my favorite County Parks, Silverwood. This is an excellent example of volunteer effort creating a beautiful restoration.

Seed Collecting – In 2024 we collected over 3,100 lbs. of seed from 169 species. This was almost entirely collected by hand, with a handful of species being collected with a seed stripper. Our staff would never be able to collect this seed on our own, but we are lucky enough to have dedicated partners and a community of volunteers who love to give back to the land. Our volunteers assist us in every step of the process. Our staff hosted 52 volunteer seed collection workdays from the end of August through mid-October. This meant we often had multiple workdays happening simultaneously, each run by 1-3 staff members throughout the fall. Not to mention volunteer groups that lead their own!

Women and Gender Minorities Seed Collection Workday

We also had three contracted Operation Fresh Start crews who spent many weeks collecting hundreds of pounds of seeds. A few species of seeded were traded with local USFWS and DNR colleagues as well. Dane County Parks is very thankful for these excellent partnerships throughout the year, no matter what the seasonal tasks are! 

OFS crew collecting Lupine
Exact Sciences corporate group seed collection workday
One of three bays where we dry our seed in kiddy pools
Dried seed waiting to be processed

Seed processing (cleaning) – Each day, after the seed has been collected, it is laid out in kiddy pools on racks to dry under fans. Once the seed is dry, we process (or clean) it. This is all done in our seed shed where we run the seed through hammer mills to break up the stems and release the seed from the vegetative plant parts. We then run the seed through fanning mills which act as a sort of sieve with a fan to separate “the wheat from the chaff” leaving us with (nearly) pure seed. Often these processes are each repeated multiple times before moving on. In this, too, our volunteers work right alongside our staff. From the end of October through mid-November we had seed cleaning workdays every day of the week. We typically run two a day, one in the morning and one in the afternoon. In total, we had 36 seed cleaning workdays last fall. Our seed shed (two bays of a pole barn) can have two hammer mills and 6 fanning mills going at once.

Volunteers using fanning mills to clean seed
Natural Areas staff, Steven Bachleda, explaining the equipment to volunteers

Weighing and bagging -Once all the seed has been cleaned, our staff weighs the totals of each species so we know what we have to work with for our seed mixes. This year we had 78 mixes, each for a different site to plant or over-seed. Dane County Parks volunteers, partner organizations, and local community groups (such as libraries and schools) request seed mixes from staff throughout the year that get on this list. Our seed is spread across the community, not just on Dane County land. The seed mixes are built in a spread sheet, and then it’s time to make them a reality by weighing out the correct amount of each species for each mix. Once again, our volunteers step up. This past year we had several seed weighing and bagging workdays in the first two weeks of the new year. Each volunteer works on one species at a time weighing out pre-determined amounts of seed, bagging them, and adding printed sticker labels with the correct mix. Staff then transport these bags into the next room and place them each in a designated mix area. 

Volunteers weighing and bagging seeds at a workday
Long-time volunteers Bonnie and Jack weighing out seed. Jack helps to build our complex spreadsheet for creating seed mixes

Seed mixing workdays – As soon we finish weighing and bagging, it’s time to dump all those bags back out again and create the individualized mixes for each site. It took just a handful of workdays to mix all 78. Volunteers come in and are supplied with shovels and brooms to mix the seed. Staff keep track of the different mixes, making sure they are bagged back up once mixed and labeled again for their designated site. This all requires a lot of coordination and triple-checking hundreds of labels. When we mix the different species of seed together, we add back in some of the chaff we previously removed. This is the “good chaff” that is not too dusty or full of twigs. It may sound counterintuitive to add back in what we worked so hard to remove, but having clean seed allows us to know exactly how much we have and carefully proportion it, while adding good chaff back in bulks up the mix so it can be spread more evenly and not have certain sizes of seed clumping up. 

Volunteers mixing seed on a workday this January
Volunteers mixing seed. It gets pretty dusty! The black tubes are connected to an air filtration device

Seed spreading in winter – Our staff spreads the largest mixes, typically the new prairie plantings, with pendulum seeders pulled behind UTVs or tractors. We prefer to do this on top of snow, so that our tracks and seed can easily be seen, allowing for an even coat. Small plantings or over-seeding areas are often planted by hand. This can also be done with rare species that need to be planted in highly specific areas. How do we hand-plant dozens of seed mixes? You guessed it, volunteers! Many parks have volunteer Friends groups or Certified Land Stewards (volunteers with training to work independently) who may be responsible for spreading their own seed mixes once they pick them up from staff. We also have several volunteer workdays where staff lead volunteers in hand planting. All of this gets completed in time for burn season! Before we know it, we will be starting to collect next year’s seed.

Steven Bachleda spreading seed with a pendulum seeder this winter. Notice the clear tracks in the snow, he can see where he has been.
School group spreads seeds through a savanna
Lars Higdon, Botanist/Naturalist, basks in our incredible Cream Gentian haul. This wasn’t even half of it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Using Grazing to Combat Invasive Species

By David Crites, Niobrara Valley Preserve Program Manager, The Nature Conservancy

Grazing is an important tool in managing grasslands and can be used to effectively limit dominant grasses from eliminating many forbs from a healthy prairie. While managing grazing on a Turner bison ranch I wondered if we could somehow use these same grazers to negatively impact invasive species.

That summer I was responsible for managing a herd of around 1,000 yearling bison. We utilized high intensity short duration grazing to manage a complex system of wet meadows on the ranch. One of these meadows had a fairly large stand of narrow leaf cattail growing around an artesian well site. You can see the dense cattail outlined in red in photo 1 below.

In this next photo the yearling bison are just moving into the pasture. The area circled in red is approximately 5 acres in size with the total paddock being 10 acres in size. The bison were held in the area by 3 strand high tensile electric fence 42 inches high on three sides. The fourth side was a single electric poly wire.

Narrow leaf cattail is actually very nutritious grazing forage. The question was how can I encourage the bison to eat that nutritious forage. To accomplish this, I lightly spread loose bison mineral in several spots among the cattails. The bison moved into the dense cattail to retrieve the mineral and while doing so grazed on the cattail. Once they tasted it, they readily ate large amounts.

In photo 2 above you can see that the bison heavily grazed a large portion of the cattail down to the ground/water level.  The mineral enticed them into the cattail patch, and once they tasted the forage, they continued to consume large quantities of the cattail.

In photo three above you can see the herd of yearlings leaving the pasture having consumed the vast majority of the cattails.  The total elapsed time for this grazing was around 28 hours.

As I continued to manage this herd of bison, they targeted cattail anytime it was available for the rest of the year. The really amazing part of this experiment came when we introduced several of these yearlings into the main herd on the ranch.  For lack of a better term, the yearlings taught the main herd animals to target cattail whenever available. Four years later, that learned behavior still exists in the herd and they continue to eat cattail.

In addition to cattail I was successful in getting the bison to target Canada thistle. I used the same process as with the cattail and although the thistle is not as palatable, the bison ate it as well. The more important result with the thistle was that they trampled the entire patch into the ground. As long as you can get the animals on the thistle prior to flowering/seed production, the trampling is equal to or better than mowing and a lot less work for the land steward.

This isn’t a solution for everyone, but if you have grazers, put them to work for you!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

Queen Anne’s Lace, exotic but not invasive

By Bill Kleiman

Daucus carota, Queen Anne’s Lace. Wilhelm and Rericha in Flora of the Chicago Region point out to us that Daucus means carrot. And of course carota means carrot. So a carrot’s carrot. If you dig up the tuber of this plant it does not smell like a tomato.

The authors also point out that Daucus carota is introduced from Eurasia. That Higley and Raddin, way back in 1891, list it as “spontaneous in waste places and old gardens but dying out in three or four years“. That is my point of this short essay! Queen Anne’s Lace is exotic, but not invasive. It is a “decreaser”. It will diminish on its own.

As Tom Vanderpoel explained to Stephen Packard, who told me three decades back; when you see queen anne’s lace you should add seed, not weed it. The plant is not much of a competitor, so when you see a bunch of Daucus carota it means there was some disturbance that simplified that bit of habitat and opened some niche space for queen anne’s lace to exploit for several years.

The photo above is a fallow front yard from a house we demolished several years back. I sprayed some broadleaf herbicide in the yard to kill some lawn weeds. So I made perfect habitat for queen anne’s lace.

Wilhelm and Rericha also state that “It since has become ubiquitous and persistent in waste ground and degraded portions of remnant natural areas. “

A few of our stewards have been known to remove queen annes lace, but this is because they have very little of it, because they have seeded the area and those native plants are starting to dominate, the queen annes lace is decreasing and they want to be rid of it. We sometimes will mow a thick patch because someone is asking us to. It is biennial so you can mow it for some effect, or spade it. But perhaps leave it and go pick some seed to plant there.

Queen Anne’s lace
From the Apiaceae family, Daucus means carrot.
The flowers later form this basket of seeds, which will turn brown about a week later.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

GRN 2025 Workshop Schedule

September 10-11, 2025 in Lawrence Kansas

Registration is full as of early August. Sorry.

Overview: Small remnant prairies in eastern Kansas host exceptional levels of plant diversity, and the combination of conservation and working lands create heterogeneity on the landscape, as well as opportunities and challenges for restoration. Local experts will share their knowledge of ethnobotany, plant ecology, biodiversity, microbiomes, fungi, and plant-soil feedback in the context of restoring grasslands. A field tour of the KU Field Station will highlight a medicinal plant garden; an immersive art exhibit that applies cultural burning in a restored grassland, and research on the interactive effects of climate, mycorrhizae, and biodiversity in restored prairie.

Meet at Baker Wetlands Discovery Center, 1365 N 1250 Rd., Lawrence, KS

11:30           Pre-workshop refreshments

12:00           Welcome and meeting orientation (Bill Kleiman and Sara Baer)

12:15           Presentation on Kansas ecosystems: Helen Alexander, Professor Emeritus and Grassland Heritage Foundation Board Member

1:00             Presentation on soil inoculants: Liz Koziol, Research Professor, Kansas Biological Survey

Break 1:45-2:00

Field presentations and discussions

2:00             Group 1: Baker Wetlands – Field talk and tour of restorations

Group 2: Depart for the KU Field Station Armitage Center

Welcome Bryan Foster, Director of the KU Field Station

2:45             Group 1: Depart to KU Field Station Armitage Center

Bryan Foster, Director of the KU Field Station

Group 2: Dimensions in biodiversity experiment

Jim Bever, Professor and Sr. Scientist, Kansas Biological Survey

3:30             Group 1: Dimensions in biodiversity experiment

Jim Bever, Professor & Senior Scientist, Kansas Biological Survey

Group 2: Here-ing exhibit – integrating art and cultural burning into restoration.

Sheena Parsons, KU Field Station Manager

3:45              Group 1: Here-ing exhibit – integrating art and cultural burning into restoration.

Sheena Parsons, KU Field Station Manager

                     Group 2: Medicinal plant garden – Ethnobotany and restoration

                                    Kelly Kindscher, Professor and Senior Scientist, Kansas Biological Survey

4:30              Group 1:  Medicinal plant garden – Ethnobotany and restoration

                                    Kelly Kindscher, Professor and Senior Scientist, Kansas Biological Survey

                     Group 2: Travel back to Baker wetlands and tour of Baker wetlands

5:30              Baker Wetlands: discussion and refreshments

Dinner with others in Lawrence  or travel to Shawnee (approximately 40 minutes).

Day 2: Exploring Prairie Restorations at Shawnee Mission Park

Meeting time and address:

8:30 am

17501 Midland Dr, Shawnee, KS 66217

We will stage at the golf course and shuttle to the restoration sites in the park adjacent to the site.

Overview of activities (8:30 am – 12:00 pm): We plan to continue our restoration conversations in the field with a day hosted by Johnson County Park and Recreation District at Shawnee Mission Park. We will explore sequentially restored prairies anchored by old growth units in a park that sees two million visitors a year. These sites reflect diverse restoration strategies in a highly visible suburban park setting. Local staff will share lessons learned from years of adaptive management, volunteer engagement, and long-term monitoring. See how restoration efforts are taking root in one of the most visited parks in Kansas City area!

Optional activity: Natural resource shop visit (8204 Renner Rd.) will be held after lunch at the Tomahawk Hills Golf Course.

REGISTRATION: Follow this link to register. Please register by August 15th. The number of participants is limited, so we encourage you to register early.  

To help cover costs, there is a suggested donation of $20 to the Kansas Biological Survey & Center for Ecological Research. Please follow this link and select “Center for Ecological Research Endowment.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 5 Comments

Testing shows confounding results. A late spring application of clethodim on mature Reed Canary Grass did not work, but then a second round of clethodim did work.

By Bill Kleiman

This is an update on an earlier post.

It is good to do simple monitoring or testing to see if a weed treatment you are using works. I will describe the simple way I tested a herbicide treatment. I retreated this patch and found it did work. Read on.

On May 30, 2024 I sprayed eight distinct mature patches of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) with clethodim herbicide. Each patch of reed canary was about six feet in diameter, the plants 3 to 4 foot tall, and in flower. So their big growth spurt was done for the season.

As I have read, it is recommended to apply clethodim when the plants have emerged several inches and are actively growing. I have tested this and it works. I was hoping for a longer application window by spraying more mature plants. Would that work?

The herbicide mix was 1.5% Intensity (clethodim), ammonium sulfate crystals (three cups added to a 50 gallon mix), and a half ounce per gallon of methylated seed oil. Maybe I needed more AMS and MSO.

In each of the eight patches I drove in a four foot tall fiberglass rod. The rod could withstand a fire and be noticeable a year later.

I sprayed the patches so the milky herbicide mix was starting to drip off.

I recorded this information into Field Maps.

I made a calendar reminder for a year later to look at the results.

Yesterday I looked, May 28 2025, and all eight patches looked very healthy. The clethodim did not control reed canary grass that was applied when the plants were mature.

One of the 8 patches treated a year previously with clethodim. They looked like this last year when I sprayed them. And they look fine a year later after clethodim. This suggests clethodim applied to mature reed canary grass in late spring does not work.

But then again. I try a second application. The next day, May 29, 2025, I did make a new clethodim mix and re-sprayed the same 8 patches of reed canary to see what happens. Below are two photos of those patches about six weeks later on July 19, 2025. They are clearly top killed. I was surprised. Top killed but are the roots dead? I will leave the fiberglass rods in them and check back in May of 2026 and report back.

Top killed reed canary grass treated with clethodom six weeks previously.

I encourage managers to test out their treatments. It was not hard. It was also not rigorous enough to publish a scientific paper or get a degree.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments