How much abundance of seed should we plant to establish a good prairie in a corn field?

By Bill Kleiman

A basic question in prairie plantings is what is the weight of seed to plant per acre?  You would think that the community of prairie restoration ecologists would have answered this question in a controlled study a few times.  But back in 2006 I did not know of any published studies, so I started a study and then partnered with ecologist, David Goldblum, to gather the data and publish a nice summary.

The punch line is you should plant a lot of seed, but there is a point of diminishing returns. For us 50 pounds per acre of uncleaned seed (with plenty of chaff) produced as good a result as did 70 pounds.

50 pounds per acre of uncleaned seed is a lot! When I first started planting prairies at Nachusa we were at perhaps 12 to 15 pounds per acre. We got mixed results, with some areas not establishing well and exotic plants occupying a lot of space. Then we noticed that volunteer Jay Stacy got a fantastic establishment of prairie by dumping on an immense amount of seed, which he was not weighing. Jay eventually produced a series of home run prairies and mentored many others here. So we increased our seeding weights, eventually hitting in the 40 to 50 pounds per acre of uncleaned seed. Our mixes were very high in species too, with 50 to 150 species. We have planting reports for many of these on the Friends of Nachusa Grasslands website.

So the data supported our theory that we need a lot of seed. Do not expect the natives to be able to keep out the exotics unless you seed a lot. And of course you will have exotics anyway as lawn grasses seem to be everywhere.

Here is a short summary of the study design:

In the fall of 2006 we set up a “random block design” to test four seed weights per acre for planting prairie seed in a field that was had been in a decades long corn/soy rotation.  This random block was a row of five cells, and there were three rows. This means there were three replicates. Each row is randomized. Hence the random block.

Here are the four treatments:

  1. 10 pounds bulk weight seed per acre.
  2. 30 pounds bulk weight seed per acre.
  3. 50 pounds bulk weight seed per acre.
  4. 70 pounds bulk weight seed per acre.
  5. Control: No seed will be added.

By bulk weight I mean the seed mix was not cleaned and contained chaff and stems. From previous comparisons to cleaned seed the bulk mix is about 40% seed by weight.

On the second growing season of the planting Northern Illinois University grad student Brian Glaves and his professor David Goldblum used quadrat to gather the data. The study was evaluated using Floristic Quality Indices recording all species and their cover

This is the random block prepped and seeded.
The seed was carefully planted by hand. The seed is hard to notice, and yet it is enough to establish a thick prairie. Seeds are little packets of hope.
Bernie and Bill. Bernie helped me plant the seed. 19 years ago Bernie!.
Paper bag B4 would contain the carefully weighed seed for that cell. Each bag had the same seed mix, but there were different weights of the mix in each bag.

David Goldblum wrote the paper we published in 2013. Here he is in 2017 setting up a different experiment at Nachusa Grasslands

Here is the link to the paper in Ecological Restoration:

The Impact of Seed Mix Weight on Diversity and Species Composition in a Tallgrass Prairie Restoration Planting, Nachusa Grasslands, Illinois, USA

David Goldblum, Brian P. Glaves, Lesley S. Rigg and Bill Kleiman

Ecological Restoration, June 2013, 31 (2) 154-167; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3368/er.31.2.154

https://er.uwpress.org/content/31/2/154

From the paper: “Low seed density plots had low species evenness, while densities of 56.0 and 78.5 kg/ha [these were the high seed rates 50 pounds and 70 pounds] showed significantly greater evenness. Based on germination and growth, the floristic quality index (FQI) was significantly lower in the control and lighter seed weight treatments. …Considering all ecological metrics analyzed, there were few differences between the 56.0 and 78.5 kg/ha treatments.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Collecting 1.4 tons of seed

by Leah Kleiman, Land Restoration Specialist, Dane County Parks, Wisconsin

Dane County Parks Natural Areas Team – Dane County Parks is responsible for managing 15,000 acres of land. The role of the Natural Areas team is to restore most of these acres to oak-hickory woodland, oak savanna, and prairie. We are currently able to actively manage 5,000 of these acres. Every year we convert several hundred acres from agricultural fields to native habitat, usually prairie, which requires a lot of seed. The slower process of restoring degraded woodland also requires the addition of seed, and we often add to previous plantings when we can. This means we require several thousand pounds of seed per year. 

One of my favorite County Parks, Silverwood. This is an excellent example of volunteer effort creating a beautiful restoration.

Seed Collecting – In 2024 we collected over 3,100 lbs. of seed from 169 species. This was almost entirely collected by hand, with a handful of species being collected with a seed stripper. Our staff would never be able to collect this seed on our own, but we are lucky enough to have dedicated partners and a community of volunteers who love to give back to the land. Our volunteers assist us in every step of the process. Our staff hosted 52 volunteer seed collection workdays from the end of August through mid-October. This meant we often had multiple workdays happening simultaneously, each run by 1-3 staff members throughout the fall. Not to mention volunteer groups that lead their own!

Women and Gender Minorities Seed Collection Workday

We also had three contracted Operation Fresh Start crews who spent many weeks collecting hundreds of pounds of seeds. A few species of seeded were traded with local USFWS and DNR colleagues as well. Dane County Parks is very thankful for these excellent partnerships throughout the year, no matter what the seasonal tasks are! 

OFS crew collecting Lupine
Exact Sciences corporate group seed collection workday
One of three bays where we dry our seed in kiddy pools
Dried seed waiting to be processed

Seed processing (cleaning) – Each day, after the seed has been collected, it is laid out in kiddy pools on racks to dry under fans. Once the seed is dry, we process (or clean) it. This is all done in our seed shed where we run the seed through hammer mills to break up the stems and release the seed from the vegetative plant parts. We then run the seed through fanning mills which act as a sort of sieve with a fan to separate “the wheat from the chaff” leaving us with (nearly) pure seed. Often these processes are each repeated multiple times before moving on. In this, too, our volunteers work right alongside our staff. From the end of October through mid-November we had seed cleaning workdays every day of the week. We typically run two a day, one in the morning and one in the afternoon. In total, we had 36 seed cleaning workdays last fall. Our seed shed (two bays of a pole barn) can have two hammer mills and 6 fanning mills going at once.

Volunteers using fanning mills to clean seed
Natural Areas staff, Steven Bachleda, explaining the equipment to volunteers

Weighing and bagging -Once all the seed has been cleaned, our staff weighs the totals of each species so we know what we have to work with for our seed mixes. This year we had 78 mixes, each for a different site to plant or over-seed. Dane County Parks volunteers, partner organizations, and local community groups (such as libraries and schools) request seed mixes from staff throughout the year that get on this list. Our seed is spread across the community, not just on Dane County land. The seed mixes are built in a spread sheet, and then it’s time to make them a reality by weighing out the correct amount of each species for each mix. Once again, our volunteers step up. This past year we had several seed weighing and bagging workdays in the first two weeks of the new year. Each volunteer works on one species at a time weighing out pre-determined amounts of seed, bagging them, and adding printed sticker labels with the correct mix. Staff then transport these bags into the next room and place them each in a designated mix area. 

Volunteers weighing and bagging seeds at a workday
Long-time volunteers Bonnie and Jack weighing out seed. Jack helps to build our complex spreadsheet for creating seed mixes

Seed mixing workdays – As soon we finish weighing and bagging, it’s time to dump all those bags back out again and create the individualized mixes for each site. It took just a handful of workdays to mix all 78. Volunteers come in and are supplied with shovels and brooms to mix the seed. Staff keep track of the different mixes, making sure they are bagged back up once mixed and labeled again for their designated site. This all requires a lot of coordination and triple-checking hundreds of labels. When we mix the different species of seed together, we add back in some of the chaff we previously removed. This is the “good chaff” that is not too dusty or full of twigs. It may sound counterintuitive to add back in what we worked so hard to remove, but having clean seed allows us to know exactly how much we have and carefully proportion it, while adding good chaff back in bulks up the mix so it can be spread more evenly and not have certain sizes of seed clumping up. 

Volunteers mixing seed on a workday this January
Volunteers mixing seed. It gets pretty dusty! The black tubes are connected to an air filtration device

Seed spreading in winter – Our staff spreads the largest mixes, typically the new prairie plantings, with pendulum seeders pulled behind UTVs or tractors. We prefer to do this on top of snow, so that our tracks and seed can easily be seen, allowing for an even coat. Small plantings or over-seeding areas are often planted by hand. This can also be done with rare species that need to be planted in highly specific areas. How do we hand-plant dozens of seed mixes? You guessed it, volunteers! Many parks have volunteer Friends groups or Certified Land Stewards (volunteers with training to work independently) who may be responsible for spreading their own seed mixes once they pick them up from staff. We also have several volunteer workdays where staff lead volunteers in hand planting. All of this gets completed in time for burn season! Before we know it, we will be starting to collect next year’s seed.

Steven Bachleda spreading seed with a pendulum seeder this winter. Notice the clear tracks in the snow, he can see where he has been.
School group spreads seeds through a savanna
Lars Higdon, Botanist/Naturalist, basks in our incredible Cream Gentian haul. This wasn’t even half of it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

Using Grazing to Combat Invasive Species

By David Crites, Niobrara Valley Preserve Program Manager, The Nature Conservancy

Grazing is an important tool in managing grasslands and can be used to effectively limit dominant grasses from eliminating many forbs from a healthy prairie. While managing grazing on a Turner bison ranch I wondered if we could somehow use these same grazers to negatively impact invasive species.

That summer I was responsible for managing a herd of around 1,000 yearling bison. We utilized high intensity short duration grazing to manage a complex system of wet meadows on the ranch. One of these meadows had a fairly large stand of narrow leaf cattail growing around an artesian well site. You can see the dense cattail outlined in red in photo 1 below.

In this next photo the yearling bison are just moving into the pasture. The area circled in red is approximately 5 acres in size with the total paddock being 10 acres in size. The bison were held in the area by 3 strand high tensile electric fence 42 inches high on three sides. The fourth side was a single electric poly wire.

Narrow leaf cattail is actually very nutritious grazing forage. The question was how can I encourage the bison to eat that nutritious forage. To accomplish this, I lightly spread loose bison mineral in several spots among the cattails. The bison moved into the dense cattail to retrieve the mineral and while doing so grazed on the cattail. Once they tasted it, they readily ate large amounts.

In photo 2 above you can see that the bison heavily grazed a large portion of the cattail down to the ground/water level.  The mineral enticed them into the cattail patch, and once they tasted the forage, they continued to consume large quantities of the cattail.

In photo three above you can see the herd of yearlings leaving the pasture having consumed the vast majority of the cattails.  The total elapsed time for this grazing was around 28 hours.

As I continued to manage this herd of bison, they targeted cattail anytime it was available for the rest of the year. The really amazing part of this experiment came when we introduced several of these yearlings into the main herd on the ranch.  For lack of a better term, the yearlings taught the main herd animals to target cattail whenever available. Four years later, that learned behavior still exists in the herd and they continue to eat cattail.

In addition to cattail I was successful in getting the bison to target Canada thistle. I used the same process as with the cattail and although the thistle is not as palatable, the bison ate it as well. The more important result with the thistle was that they trampled the entire patch into the ground. As long as you can get the animals on the thistle prior to flowering/seed production, the trampling is equal to or better than mowing and a lot less work for the land steward.

This isn’t a solution for everyone, but if you have grazers, put them to work for you!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

Queen Anne’s Lace, exotic but not invasive

By Bill Kleiman

Daucus carota, Queen Anne’s Lace. Wilhelm and Rericha in Flora of the Chicago Region point out to us that Daucus means carrot. And of course carota means carrot. So a carrot’s carrot. If you dig up the tuber of this plant it does not smell like a tomato.

The authors also point out that Daucus carota is introduced from Eurasia. That Higley and Raddin, way back in 1891, list it as “spontaneous in waste places and old gardens but dying out in three or four years“. That is my point of this short essay! Queen Anne’s Lace is exotic, but not invasive. It is a “decreaser”. It will diminish on its own.

As Tom Vanderpoel explained to Stephen Packard, who told me three decades back; when you see queen anne’s lace you should add seed, not weed it. The plant is not much of a competitor, so when you see a bunch of Daucus carota it means there was some disturbance that simplified that bit of habitat and opened some niche space for queen anne’s lace to exploit for several years.

The photo above is a fallow front yard from a house we demolished several years back. I sprayed some broadleaf herbicide in the yard to kill some lawn weeds. So I made perfect habitat for queen anne’s lace.

Wilhelm and Rericha also state that “It since has become ubiquitous and persistent in waste ground and degraded portions of remnant natural areas. “

A few of our stewards have been known to remove queen annes lace, but this is because they have very little of it, because they have seeded the area and those native plants are starting to dominate, the queen annes lace is decreasing and they want to be rid of it. We sometimes will mow a thick patch because someone is asking us to. It is biennial so you can mow it for some effect, or spade it. But perhaps leave it and go pick some seed to plant there.

Queen Anne’s lace
From the Apiaceae family, Daucus means carrot.
The flowers later form this basket of seeds, which will turn brown about a week later.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

GRN 2025 Workshop Schedule

September 10-11, 2025 in Lawrence Kansas

Registration is full as of early August. Sorry.

Overview: Small remnant prairies in eastern Kansas host exceptional levels of plant diversity, and the combination of conservation and working lands create heterogeneity on the landscape, as well as opportunities and challenges for restoration. Local experts will share their knowledge of ethnobotany, plant ecology, biodiversity, microbiomes, fungi, and plant-soil feedback in the context of restoring grasslands. A field tour of the KU Field Station will highlight a medicinal plant garden; an immersive art exhibit that applies cultural burning in a restored grassland, and research on the interactive effects of climate, mycorrhizae, and biodiversity in restored prairie.

Meet at Baker Wetlands Discovery Center, 1365 N 1250 Rd., Lawrence, KS

11:30           Pre-workshop refreshments

12:00           Welcome and meeting orientation (Bill Kleiman and Sara Baer)

12:15           Presentation on Kansas ecosystems: Helen Alexander, Professor Emeritus and Grassland Heritage Foundation Board Member

1:00             Presentation on soil inoculants: Liz Koziol, Research Professor, Kansas Biological Survey

Break 1:45-2:00

Field presentations and discussions

2:00             Group 1: Baker Wetlands – Field talk and tour of restorations

Group 2: Depart for the KU Field Station Armitage Center

Welcome Bryan Foster, Director of the KU Field Station

2:45             Group 1: Depart to KU Field Station Armitage Center

Bryan Foster, Director of the KU Field Station

Group 2: Dimensions in biodiversity experiment

Jim Bever, Professor and Sr. Scientist, Kansas Biological Survey

3:30             Group 1: Dimensions in biodiversity experiment

Jim Bever, Professor & Senior Scientist, Kansas Biological Survey

Group 2: Here-ing exhibit – integrating art and cultural burning into restoration.

Sheena Parsons, KU Field Station Manager

3:45              Group 1: Here-ing exhibit – integrating art and cultural burning into restoration.

Sheena Parsons, KU Field Station Manager

                     Group 2: Medicinal plant garden – Ethnobotany and restoration

                                    Kelly Kindscher, Professor and Senior Scientist, Kansas Biological Survey

4:30              Group 1:  Medicinal plant garden – Ethnobotany and restoration

                                    Kelly Kindscher, Professor and Senior Scientist, Kansas Biological Survey

                     Group 2: Travel back to Baker wetlands and tour of Baker wetlands

5:30              Baker Wetlands: discussion and refreshments

Dinner with others in Lawrence  or travel to Shawnee (approximately 40 minutes).

Day 2: Exploring Prairie Restorations at Shawnee Mission Park

Meeting time and address:

8:30 am

17501 Midland Dr, Shawnee, KS 66217

We will stage at the golf course and shuttle to the restoration sites in the park adjacent to the site.

Overview of activities (8:30 am – 12:00 pm): We plan to continue our restoration conversations in the field with a day hosted by Johnson County Park and Recreation District at Shawnee Mission Park. We will explore sequentially restored prairies anchored by old growth units in a park that sees two million visitors a year. These sites reflect diverse restoration strategies in a highly visible suburban park setting. Local staff will share lessons learned from years of adaptive management, volunteer engagement, and long-term monitoring. See how restoration efforts are taking root in one of the most visited parks in Kansas City area!

Optional activity: Natural resource shop visit (8204 Renner Rd.) will be held after lunch at the Tomahawk Hills Golf Course.

REGISTRATION: Follow this link to register. Please register by August 15th. The number of participants is limited, so we encourage you to register early.  

To help cover costs, there is a suggested donation of $20 to the Kansas Biological Survey & Center for Ecological Research. Please follow this link and select “Center for Ecological Research Endowment.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 5 Comments

Testing shows confounding results. A late spring application of clethodim on mature Reed Canary Grass did not work, but then a second round of clethodim did work.

By Bill Kleiman

This is an update on an earlier post.

It is good to do simple monitoring or testing to see if a weed treatment you are using works. I will describe the simple way I tested a herbicide treatment. I retreated this patch and found it did work. Read on.

On May 30, 2024 I sprayed eight distinct mature patches of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) with clethodim herbicide. Each patch of reed canary was about six feet in diameter, the plants 3 to 4 foot tall, and in flower. So their big growth spurt was done for the season.

As I have read, it is recommended to apply clethodim when the plants have emerged several inches and are actively growing. I have tested this and it works. I was hoping for a longer application window by spraying more mature plants. Would that work?

The herbicide mix was 1.5% Intensity (clethodim), ammonium sulfate crystals (three cups added to a 50 gallon mix), and a half ounce per gallon of methylated seed oil. Maybe I needed more AMS and MSO.

In each of the eight patches I drove in a four foot tall fiberglass rod. The rod could withstand a fire and be noticeable a year later.

I sprayed the patches so the milky herbicide mix was starting to drip off.

I recorded this information into Field Maps.

I made a calendar reminder for a year later to look at the results.

Yesterday I looked, May 28 2025, and all eight patches looked very healthy. The clethodim did not control reed canary grass that was applied when the plants were mature.

One of the 8 patches treated a year previously with clethodim. They looked like this last year when I sprayed them. And they look fine a year later after clethodim. This suggests clethodim applied to mature reed canary grass in late spring does not work.

But then again. I try a second application. The next day, May 29, 2025, I did make a new clethodim mix and re-sprayed the same 8 patches of reed canary to see what happens. Below are two photos of those patches about six weeks later on July 19, 2025. They are clearly top killed. I was surprised. Top killed but are the roots dead? I will leave the fiberglass rods in them and check back in May of 2026 and report back.

Top killed reed canary grass treated with clethodom six weeks previously.

I encourage managers to test out their treatments. It was not hard. It was also not rigorous enough to publish a scientific paper or get a degree.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Stump Grinder – Review

Mike Saxton – Manager of Ecological Restoration and Land Stewardship – Shaw Nature Reserve – Gray Summit, MO

Stump grinders are one of those tools that you don’t use often and when you do use one…you sometimes have to re-learn your technique if it’s been a couple years since you operated last. If you use them so infrequently, perhaps it’s best to rent or barrow. There are a lot of different models out there and most have a big spinning disk with replaceable teeth. You can picture it.

As part of a 120 acre prairie establishment / logging project, we have ground thousands and thousands of stumps using a Kubota SVL track loader and a Fecon StumpEx stump grinder. I outlined that project in a previous GRN blog post

Fecon StumpEx – 1,368 lbs, bit diameter is 32″, requires 20-42 gallons per minute high flow

Kubota SVL loader – we were running the StumpEx on an SVL-90-2 for a couple years. High flow GPM = 36. We are now running it on a new Kubota SVL-97 with a high flow GPM = 40. So we are at the upper end of the StumpEx flow requirements.

The above stump took about 1 minute to grind below grade. It was roughly 15in diameter and 3in tall.

A well-conditioned cutting tooth will peel off large chunks of stump – 3/4in thick in this picture.

New purchase price was $21,000. I’m told the hydraulic pump is $12K to replace. The spiral cone is $1K to replace. And we just found out that the cutting bit is $8K to replace.

After many thousands of cedar, oak, and ash stumps, we had lost a lot of material both from wear and from conditioning (I hesitate to call it “sharpening” because you don’t want a sharp edge). We had a weld break and while it could be repaired, the writing was on the wall. After a few years of use, thousands of stumps and about 90 acres of stumps clear…we had to replace the bit.

If you grind a few stumps a year, this implement might be overkill. If you remove dozens of stumps each year and will continue to do so for many years, this could be a worth while investment. It’s well built and performs well. Handles large stumps in no time. It is pricey but you get what you pay for with Fecon products.

(yes – we could have dozed or dug out the stumps with an excavator. Thousands of root balls and a pock marked, divoted landscape would have been the result. This was a big commitment but we felt the right choice for the future of this restored prairie.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Overseeding and Disturbance in a Tallgrass Prairie

By: Bill Kleiman – Director Nachusa Grasslands, Elizabeth Bach – Research Scientist Nachusa Grasslands, Elizabeth Becker – Doctoral Student SDSU / UC Davis Joint Doctoral Program in Ecology

Restoring any ecosystem is extremely difficult and getting it right on the “first try” nears impossibility. For tallgrass prairies, attempts to leap from an abandoned agricultural landscape to a highly diverse prairie are often thwarted by non-native species and an over-abundance of warm season grasses like big bluestem.  How then, can we go from an established prairie with moderate forb diversity to a high diversity prairie?

Over a decade ago, Bill Kleiman, the Project Director of Nachusa Grasslands, asked this question and wanted to know if adding seed to an already restored prairie (i.e., overseeding) would increase diversity. He established treatment plots across three sites at Nachusa in 2009 and 2012 that varied in seed inputs and disturbance intensities to test this. The full details of this experiment can be found here, but the abridged version of the treatments is below:

  • Control plots: no manipulations
  • Seed: overseeding only
  • Low intensity disturbance: harrowing and overseeding
  • Intermediate intensity disturbance: harrowing, overseeding, and additional applications of Poast grass herbicide during the growing season
  • High intensity disturbance: Disking, harrowing, and overseeding

In 2023, species composition and abundance data were collected in each of the treatment plots (photo 1). Data collection consisted of identifying all species and their percent cover in three 1m x 1m quadrats that was then averaged across each treatment plot.

Photo 1: Species composition and abundance data collection in a treatment plot.

When compared to control plots, it was found that the high intensity disturbance treatments increased native species richness by over 40% and native species diversity by 15%. The low intensity disturbance plots also increased native species richness and diversity by 20% and 12% respectively, when compared to controls. In high intensity plots, we found an average of 23.2 native species averaged across all plots compared to only 16.4 native species in the control plots. In the low intensity plots the average number of native species found was 21.6 native species. This data can be seen in the graph below.

Figure 1. Average native species richness across each treatment. The number of native species is indicated at the top of each box. The stars on the graph indicate the amount of significance compared

In short, we found that overseeding paired with topsoil disturbance is key to increasing plant species richness and diversity in established prairie plantings. Overseeding alone did not seem to result in significant increases in richness or diversity over time in this instance. This could be because this was a singular overseeding event and multiple rounds of overseeding may be needed for it to successfully increase native species richness and diversity.  

Disturbance is likely important in this scenario because it disrupted the roots of some established species and reduced competition above- and belowground for newly sown species. Even the low intensity disturbance, which may not have fully disrupted the rooting structures of established species, was likely important for forming microsites in the soil which allowed some seeds to successfully germinate and establish over time.

Contrarily, we found that additional herbicide application may negate the positive impacts of disturbance, inhibiting native species richness and diversity. This is likely due to non-target effects of the herbicide though it is unclear what was driving these non-target effects in this experiment.

Finally, as Bill noted in previous posts, it is difficult to distinguish these treatment differences by just walking through the prairie. Since the treatments can be resource intensive, mangers should weigh these differences with respect to their specific goals before implementation.

If you would like to read the full research article for this published work, please contact Elizabeth Becker (ebecker(at)sdsu.edu) and she can send you copy. Thanks for reading!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 6 Comments

When to mow sweet clover to control it

By Bill Kleiman

Yellow and white sweet clover (Melilotus officinalis and M alba) are on the invasive weed list of many natural areas managers. The plants are biennial, so on year two they bolt, bloom, and produce a lot of seed. They are a legume and their seed sits in the soil for years, releasing some annually to give you a run for your money.

I bet some insects like the nectar and pollen sweet clover produces, and in a pasture I would think cattle would graze it. It was originally brought to the continent for hay. We managers have seen how sweet clover can form incredible thickets and so we push back when feasible.

A long time ago my new boss Stephen Packard told me you can mow the sweet clovers to kill them but you have to mow them below the lowest leaves. If you mow above the lowest leaves it will resprout.

As sweet clover matures the leaves die off from the ground up.

A key point here is the longer you wait the higher you can mow.

I have found Stephen’s advice to be solid. Decades back we reduced fields of white and yellow sweet clover with mowing done at the right time. A few years later we only had to spot mow some patches, then later just some backpack spraying of patches, and now just a sprinkling of plants we can spade or spray or cut.

As with all weeds, you have strategies for some areas that are different from other areas. Mowing sweet clover won’t work in rocky areas. If you have thousands of acres to manage you may not have sweet clover on the top of your list of weeds. Like many ecological questions the answer starts with “It depends”.

June 25, 2013: Removing sweet clover. You only need to remove sweet clover if the seeds are forming.

The yellow sweet clover blooms first. Wait to mow it until it is just about to be mature enough to produce seed. At Nachusa this is about June 15 to 20. White sweet clover is ready to mow around the Fourth of July.

June 18: Stihl FSA 200 electric brush saw cutting a yellow sweet clover. A brush saw can mow nearly flush to the ground so they can be a good choice of a tool. They are faster than spading or hand scything. But we still mostly use a spade as the spade is cheap and effective.
We are about to try this tri blade out which comes with its own orange shield. We hear this will work well.
Gas string trimmer to cut yellow sweet clover. White sweet clover is too robust for a string trimmer.
White sweet clover on June 17. Note that to mow this below the lowest leaf stem you would have to cut flush with the ground. That won’t happen with a mower.
Yellow sweet clover on June 15. So this could be mowed at the height where I hold the plant, perhaps 5 inches. Many mowers can do this.
June 15: Yellow sweet clover. You would need to mow at the height I am holding it, essentially flush with the ground. A mower can’t do this. You could cut it with a spade flush with the ground, but we tend to use the “Parsnip Predator” weed spade to loosen the soil and then pull it up with the roots. If the plants are in seed when cut then they need to be removed from the field.
June 14: Yellow sweet clover. That stem with leaves on it means you can’t mow this plant yet.
June 7: So how low do we have to mow this one?
June 5: A yellow sweet clover that was mowed June 5. Too early is what I concluded. It is a macerated mess but there were a few leaves below the cut.

Patience is a prairie word: A key point here is the longer you wait the higher you can mow sweet clover.

June 16: Yellow sweet clover in early seed. I would haul this one out if you can.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 5 Comments

Testing shows confounding results. A late spring application of clethodim on mature Reed Canary Grass did not work, but then a second round of clethodim did work.

By Bill Kleiman

This is an update on an earlier post.

It is good to do simple monitoring or testing to see if a weed treatment you are using works. I will describe the simple way I tested a herbicide treatment. I retreated this patch and found it did work. Read on.

On May 30, 2024 I sprayed eight distinct mature patches of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) with clethodim herbicide. Each patch of reed canary was about six feet in diameter, the plants 3 to 4 foot tall, and in flower. So their big growth spurt was done for the season.

As I have read, it is recommended to apply clethodim when the plants have emerged several inches and are actively growing. I have tested this and it works. I was hoping for a longer application window by spraying more mature plants. Would that work?

The herbicide mix was 1.5% Intensity (clethodim), ammonium sulfate crystals (three cups added to a 50 gallon mix), and a half ounce per gallon of methylated seed oil. Maybe I needed more AMS and MSO.

In each of the eight patches I drove in a four foot tall fiberglass rod. The rod could withstand a fire and be noticeable a year later.

I sprayed the patches so the milky herbicide mix was starting to drip off.

I recorded this information into Field Maps.

I made a calendar reminder for a year later to look at the results.

Yesterday I looked, May 28 2025, and all eight patches looked very healthy. The clethodim did not control reed canary grass that was applied when the plants were mature.

One of the 8 patches treated a year previously with clethodim. They looked like this last year when I sprayed them. And they look fine a year later after clethodim. This suggests clethodim applied to mature reed canary grass in late spring does not work.

But then again. I try a second application. The next day, May 29, 2025, I did make a new clethodim mix and re-sprayed the same 8 patches of reed canary to see what happens. Below are two photos of those patches about six weeks later on July 19, 2025. They are clearly top killed. I was surprised. Top killed but are the roots dead? I will leave the fiberglass rods in them and check back in May of 2026 and report back.

Top killed reed canary grass treated with clethodom six weeks previously.

I encourage managers to test out their treatments. It was not hard. It was also not rigorous enough to publish a scientific paper or get a degree.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments