First Steps in Bringing Back Prairie

Mike Saxton – Executive Director – Friends of Nachusa Grasslands

The Friends of Nachusa Grasslands recently protected a 195-acre tract adjacent to The Nature Conservancy’s Nachusa Grasslands. The new acquisition is an important site with restoration potential for high-levels of native biodiversity.

Left – 1939 aerial Right – 2025 aerial

In the 1939 aerial (left), you can see row crop fields and can make out cattle paths through pasture (likely native prairie). Oaks are scattered in the southwest corner of the unit.

In the current aerial (right), the row crop acreage remains virtually unchanged while all of the pasture has gone through old field succession, transitioning from open prairie to closed canopy woodland. The formerly open oak corner is now fully stocked and densely treed.

Day after closing on the property, staff and volunteers were running forestry mowers, shredding the light-choking brush

When Friends of Nachusa Grasslands protected this tract in December 2025, the woodlands were an impenetrable thicket of bush honeysuckle. The once open pasture (presumably prairie plants in 1939) is now a majority black cherry and Osage orange. The south, southwest and west facing slopes have pockets of little bluestem in scattered eastern red cedar openings. In the late 1990s, prairie petunia (Ruellia humilis) was still growing in the few remaining light gaps.

Eventually, we will restore the row crop fields to high diversity, rich habitat for which Nachusa Grasslands is well known. Going from row-crop to prairie is a fairly straightforward process.

But restoring and caring for 65-acres of formerly open prairie/pasture which is now a cherry and Osage orange woodland is a much more challenging task. What can our investment of time, energy and stewardship restore?

We are assessing the challenges and opportunities this project presents and after just a month of ownership, nearly 50 acres of brush has been mowed and scores of trees felled. We are energized and eager!

Left: south facing slope where brush has been mowed and trees cleared. Perhaps some remnant prairie plants remain? Right: A good operator with a skid loader and grapple is an amazing resource.
Left: In the uplands, former prairie pasture turned to Osage orange dominated areas. A challenge for sawyers and mowers. Right: Once the brush is mowed, you begin to “see the forest for the trees” and the amount of work that lays ahead.

How soon can we begin to manage the area with fire? How much (perhaps precious little) remnant prairie was hidden in the thickets? After decades of shading and successional transition, will there be unforeseen invasives springing up? At what point do we actively begin seeding? What is a realistic timeline for our stewardship efforts? These and many, many others are the questions we are pondering.

Our work is that of trial-and-error and we learn by doing. In the months and years to come, a combination of invasive species control, Rx fire, and generous seed addition will be invested in the site. Staff and volunteers will invest mightily in this site. We will document progress and share our results. Stewardship has a beginning but no end!

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to First Steps in Bringing Back Prairie

  1. fran harty's avatar fran harty says:

    Mike, Congrats and welcome back. Very nice article. fran

  2. cdp9's avatar cdp9 says:

    Have you considered killing the trees in place with drill-and-fill and leaving them to die upright, creating red-headed woodpecker habitat?

  3. Paul Swanson's avatar Paul Swanson says:

    Great read Mike! These areas that show great restoration potential are fun to hear about and fun to watch heal through the years. Great photos to help illustrate how old pictures can inspire efforts to restore forgotten prairie. Thanks for posting.

  4. Don Osmund's avatar Don Osmund says:

    For the former pasture, what are the range of options & pros/cons regarding control of woody resprouts? Reports of foliar herbiciding vary a lot in efficacy. If foliar is used, would seeding occur afterwards? It seems to me a particularly difficult problem is if the foliar application partially fails in an area with small diameter dense brush, because subsequent foliar applications will negatively impact the herbaceous layer that was seeded in.

    Would the weed wiper described in the 8/26/21 entry for this blog be cost effective for resprout control if shared among agencies?

Leave a comment