Finesse vs. Brute Force in Invasive Plant Management

Part 1 – The Soapbox

By: Julianne Mason, Restoration Program Coordinator, Forest Preserve District of Will County

Invasive plant management often feels like a brute force exercise.  We use the language of battle when we talk about killing invasive species.  However, it’s important to keep in mind that the actual goal isn’t to kill invasive plants – it’s to preserve or restore native plant diversity and community integrity.  It’s not only Kill, Kill, Kill.  Yes, we need to control invasive plant species before they take over and reduce the diversity of natives.  Yes, it’s often necessary to apply herbicides to kill invasive plants.  But it’s equally as important to do so in a way that promotes or re-establishes a diverse native community.  Otherwise, we’re caught in a downward spiral of killing plants, resulting in bare holes that get colonized by more weeds and invasive plants, killing those plants, creating more bare holes that get colonized by weeds, etc., etc., etc. 

The finesse strategy of invasive plant management recognizes that it’s generally most effective to use a selective chemical, selective application method, or selective timing to be able to control the invasive while minimizing collateral damage to native plant species.  Despite being as selective as possible, using herbicides can cause collateral damage to the native plant species that we’re trying to protect.  Furthermore, causing collateral damage to native plants can reduce the competition faced by invasive plants and can tip the localized playing field to favor more invasives.   I’m not saying that we shouldn’t control invasive species – we absolutely must do so to preserve native plant diversity.  However, we need to be mindful that using herbicides effectively must both: 1) effectively control the invasive, and 2) minimize impacts to native plants, or at least not inhibit their re-establishment. 

Unknown's avatar

About Grassland Restoration Network blog

Bill Kleiman, Julianne Mason, and Mike Saxton publish this blog. Bill's daytime job is director of Nachusa Grasslands with The Nature Conservancy. Julianne works for the Forest Preserve District of Will County. Mike Saxton works for the Missouri Botanical Garden at their Shaw Nature Reserve. We are looking for guest authors on various topics of grassland habitat restoration. Contact us with your ideas.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Finesse vs. Brute Force in Invasive Plant Management

  1. prairiebotanist's avatar prairiebotanist says:

    Hear hear!

    1. Always go into work on a site knowing what good things are there and need to be avoided
    2. Take notes on conditions and methods when using herbicide
    3. Take photos of the area before application
    4. Return after after an appropriate amount of time to evaluate collateral damage
    5. Some entities/people do a lot of control on already well-established invasives in degraded areas that aren’t slated for intensive restoration efforts and that pose no immediate threat to adjacent high quality areas … or areas that have underlying issues that led to invasion that aren’t being addressed. That’s a waste of resources. This often happens when projects target an invasive and go after it wherever it is found rather than target areas of high quality or potential where stewardship can be sustained and seek to address the invasive species that threaten ecological integrity on those sites.

    Things not on the label:

    Rain, even after the period required for rain-fast-ness, can wash or splatter herbicide and lead to collateral damage. The longer it is until rain is forecast, the better.

    Dripping herbicide onto snow during winter cut stump on basal applications can cause collateral damage.

    Dripping herbicide on to soil can cause collateral damage, especially on sandy soil that has limited ability to immobilize herbicides.

    Many desirable plants maintain living tissues at or above the soil surface through the winter that can lead to them being damaged by broadcast spray or overspray from basal treatments.

  2. Don Osmund's avatar Don Osmund says:

    We are entering a new phase in ecological restoration. I framed my previous work as a battle between good & evil. My mindset was to save the planet by identifying & attacking the enemy. More recently, I’ve tried to establish a relationship with the land, letting it tell me what it needs & what it doesn’t. This new approach feels much better, minimizes harm & is more effective.

    Comment #5 by prairiebotanist points to the need for management plans. One of the first things to do when creating a plan is to divide a site into management units, informed by a survey of community types, soil moisture, quality assessment, invasive plant density, restoration potential, etc. Then those units are prioritized in accordance with overall site goals.

Leave a comment